Comments on: Albemarle Land Use Tax http://www.cvillerentals.com/blog/2008042836/albemarle-land-use-tax/ Thoughts on the Central Virginia Real Estate Rental Market Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:50:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7 by: Lonnie http://www.cvillerentals.com/blog/2008042836/albemarle-land-use-tax/#comment-11147 Thu, 15 May 2008 20:26:18 +0000 http://www.cvillerentals.com/blog/2008042836/albemarle-land-use-tax/#comment-11147 Correction. I realize now it was Slutzky, not Rooker who commented about "Bogus Economics". Correction. I realize now it was Slutzky, not Rooker who commented about “Bogus Economics”.

]]>
by: Lonnie http://www.cvillerentals.com/blog/2008042836/albemarle-land-use-tax/#comment-11144 Thu, 15 May 2008 16:14:58 +0000 http://www.cvillerentals.com/blog/2008042836/albemarle-land-use-tax/#comment-11144 Okay, first of all, there are alot of myths floating out there about land-use valuation. It is my understanding that the BOS is not seriously considering getting rid of the program but rather tightening the requirements to make sure people are <i>actually</i> farming. Frankly I'm not sure how a "non-working farm" qualifies farm at all. That just amounts to the poorer half of the county paying the wealthy landowners taxes for no good reason. In terms of the "cows don't go to school" argument, I'll repeat Dennis Rooker's response that it is bogus economics. The question you have to ask yourself is what happens when that land is finally developed? Sure, it may have sat out there for twenty years as open space under land-use, but suddenly developing it all at once causes a huge tax burden and makes planning near impossible. If it had been gradually subdivided over twenty years the cost to the public would be far less, since roads and other infrastructure woudfl be expanded gradually. Instead, developers wait until the market is at the highest point of demand (while being subsidized by taxpayers to do it) then create a situation where overnight the county has to pay for more roads, schools, water and fire services. This is effectively what is happening with Buscuit Run. So... the end result is that cows and "unused farmland" don't save the county money when the ultimate plan is to put families on it that will drive cars and have kids that <i>do</i> go to school. Okay, first of all, there are alot of myths floating out there about land-use valuation. It is my understanding that the BOS is not seriously considering getting rid of the program but rather tightening the requirements to make sure people are actually farming. Frankly I’m not sure how a “non-working farm” qualifies farm at all. That just amounts to the poorer half of the county paying the wealthy landowners taxes for no good reason.

In terms of the “cows don’t go to school” argument, I’ll repeat Dennis Rooker’s response that it is bogus economics. The question you have to ask yourself is what happens when that land is finally developed? Sure, it may have sat out there for twenty years as open space under land-use, but suddenly developing it all at once causes a huge tax burden and makes planning near impossible. If it had been gradually subdivided over twenty years the cost to the public would be far less, since roads and other infrastructure woudfl be expanded gradually. Instead, developers wait until the market is at the highest point of demand (while being subsidized by taxpayers to do it) then create a situation where overnight the county has to pay for more roads, schools, water and fire services. This is effectively what is happening with Buscuit Run. So… the end result is that cows and “unused farmland” don’t save the county money when the ultimate plan is to put families on it that will drive cars and have kids that do go to school.

]]>